Comparative Analysis of MobileNetV2 Inference Performance on CPU, GPU and TPU for Agricultural Object Classification in Embedded Systems

Authors

Keywords:

Precision agriculture, MobileNetV2, TPU, GPU, CPU, Embedded systems

Abstract

The advancement of smart agriculture requires efficient computer vision solutions capable of operating on low-cost, low-power devices. This paper presents a comparative analysis of the inference performance of the MobileNetV2 model across different hardware architectures: a desktop CPU (Ryzen 5 5600G), a GPU (NVIDIA GTX 1070), and an embedded system equipped with a TPU (Google Coral Dev Board). The study evaluated inference time and frames per second (FPS) in both batch and online processing modes using datasets of agricultural insects, such as the whitefly.

The results demonstrate that the GPU is the fastest architecture for batch inference, reaching up to 683.28 FPS with a 97.93% accuracy rate. In contrast, Coral TPU proved to be the most efficient for online inference, achieving up to 348.96 FPS with 91.76% accuracy, whereas the CPU showed intermediate performance and lower energy efficiency. These findings confirm the viability of deploying MobileNetV2 for agricultural applications on embedded devices, highlighting that hardware selection depends strictly on the application: GPUs are ideal for massive data processing, while TPUs are optimal for real-time, edge-computing deployments in the field.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • jesus roberto millan almaraz, Facultad de ciencias Fisicomatemáticas / Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa

    Profesor Investigador con más de 15 años de experiencia en docencia e investigación, miembro del SNII nivel 2 con perfil deseable PRODEP y entusiasta de la ciencia, tecnología e innovación. Actualmente se encuentra adscrito a la Facultad de Ciencias Físico Matemáticas de la Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa donde fue coordinador por más de 6 años del programa académico de Licenciatura en Ingeniería Electrónica donde a participado y dirigido proyectos de investigación e innovación con participación de estudiantes de licenciatura, maestría y doctorado. A lo largo de su carrera profesional a publicado diversos artículos en revistas indizadas en el JCR, congresos, capítulos de libro, propiedad intelectual así como también a dirigido diversas tesis de licenciatura y posgrado. Sus líneas de investigación son el desarrollo de sistemas embebidos y soluciones computacionales para aplicaciones de monitoreo, instrumentación y análisis de datos de procesos agrícolas y estructuras civiles.

References

Y. Li, G. N. Mbata, S. Punnuri, A. M. Simmons, and D. I. Shapiro-Ilan, “Bemisia tabaci on Vegetables in the southern United States: Incidence, impact, and management,” Insects, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 1–29, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.3390/insects12030198.

C. Lykas and I. Vagelas, “Innovations in Agriculture for Sustainable Agro-Systems,” Sep. 01, 2023, Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). doi: 10.3390/agronomy13092309.

J. Sharma et al., “Deep learning based ensemble model for accurate tomato leaf disease classification by leveraging ResNet50 and MobileNetV2 architectures,” Sci. Rep., vol. 15, no. 1, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-98015-x.

M. Pintus, F. Colucci, and F. Maggio, “Emerging Developments in Real-Time Edge AIoT for Agricultural Image Classification,” Mar. 01, 2025, Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). doi: 10.3390/iot6010013.

A. Morchid, R. Jebabra, H. M. Khalid, R. El Alami, H. Qjidaa, and M. Ouazzani Jamil, “IoT-based smart irrigation management system to enhance agricultural water security using embedded systems, telemetry data, and cloud computing,” Results in Engineering, vol. 23, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.rineng.2024.102829.

R. Tobiasz, G. Wilczynski, P. Graszka, N. Czechowski, and S. Luczak, “Edge Devices Inference Performance Comparison,” Journal of Computing Science and Engineering, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 51–59, 2023, doi: 10.5626/JCSE.2023.17.2.51.

M. Sandler, A. Howard, M. Zhu, A. Zhmoginov, and L.-C. Chen, “MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottlenecks,” in 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2018, pp. 4510–4520. doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2018.00474.

T. Njoroge, R. Kibuku, and K. Mugoye, “Comparative and edge-hybrid modeling of EfficientNetV2 and MobileNetV2 for multi-classcrop disease classification with statistical validation,” Journal of Edge Computing, vol. 4, pp. 234–262, Nov. 2025, doi: 10.55056/jec.905.

U. J. L. dos Santos, G. Pessin, C. A. da Costa, and R. da Rosa Righi, “AgriPrediction: A proactive internet of things model to anticipate problems and improve production in agricultural crops,” Comput. Electron. Agric., vol. 161, pp. 202–213, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2018.10.010.

S. Prof, B. Sharon, P. P, P. S, S. Prince, and R. R, “Smart Agriculture with IoT,” International Journal of Innovative Research in Information Security, vol. 09, no. 03, pp. 225–228, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.26562/ijiris.2023.v0903.31.

J. I. Saez Rojas, J. M. Pantoja, M. Matamala, I. C. Briceno, J. P. Vasconez, and A. R. Romero-Conrado, “An IoT-Based Prototype for Optimizing Agricultural Irrigation: A Case Study in the Biobio Region of Chile,” in Procedia Computer Science, Elsevier B.V., 2024, pp. 1009–1014. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2024.06.127.

A. C. Teixeira, J. Ribeiro, R. Morais, J. J. Sousa, and A. Cunha, “A Systematic Review on Automatic Insect Detection Using Deep Learning,” Mar. 01, 2023, MDPI. doi: 10.3390/agriculture13030713.

A. Srinivasa, “Real-time early detection of weed plants in pulse crop field using drone with IoT”, doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.27656.03845.

M. Dong, H. Yu, Z. Sun, L. Zhang, Y. Sui, and R. Zhao, “Research on agricultural environmental monitoring Internet of Things based on edge computing and deep learning,” Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 33, May 2024, doi: 10.1515/jisys-2023-0114.

A. Garcia-Perez, R. Miñón, A. I. Torre-Bastida, and E. Zulueta-Guerrero, “Analysing Edge Computing Devices for the Deployment of Embedded AI,” Sensors, vol. 23, no. 23, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.3390/s23239495.

Análisis Comparativo del Rendimiento de Inferencia de MobileNetV2 en CPU, GPU y TPU para la Clasificación de Objetos Agrícolas en Sistemas Embebidos

Downloads

Published

2026-05-31

How to Cite

Comparative Analysis of MobileNetV2 Inference Performance on CPU, GPU and TPU for Agricultural Object Classification in Embedded Systems. (2026). International Journal of Information Science and Technological Applications-UAS IJISTA, 2(1), 10 – 18. https://revistas.uas.edu.mx/index.php/IJISTA/article/view/1812