Structure and ecological function of the epibiotic community associated with two sponge speciesof the genus Geodia in a seagrass meadows ofthe southern Gulf of Mexico

Authors

  • Enrique Ávila Torres Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, Estación El Carmen, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Carretera Carmen-Puerto Realkm 9 . 5 , Ciudad del Carmen , Campeche, México Author https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7074-1603
  • José Alberto Aguirre-Téllez Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, Estación El Carmen, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Carretera Carmen-Puerto Real km 9.5, Ciudad del Carmen , Campeche, México. Author
  • Laura Elena Vázquez-Maldonado Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Autónoma del Carmen, Ciudad del Carmen, Campeche, México. Author
  • María Amparo Rodríguez-Santiago Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, Estación El Carmen, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Carretera Carmen-Puerto Real km 9.5, Ciudad del Carmen , Campeche, México. Author https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0616-237X

Keywords:

Epibionts, marine sponges, Gulf of Mexico, sedimentation, benthic associations

Abstract

Marine sponges stand out for their ability to harbor a wide diversity and abundance of epibionts and endobionts, with which they can establish different types of ecological relationships. In Thalassia testudinum meadows of Isla del Carmen (Campeche), two sponge species of the genus Geodia were taxonomically identified, along with the species composition of their epibiotic community and its potential ecological role within this association. The epibiont community (species richness, diversity, and relative abundance) and the percentage of similarity between individuals of these two basibiont sponge species were characterized, and an in situ experiment was conducted to determine whether epibionts provide protection against predation. The basibiont sponges were identified as Geodia cf. tumulosa and G. media var. leptorhaphes, constituting the first record of both species for the southern Gulf of Mexico. In the five specimens examined, a total of 95 epibiotic organisms were recorded, belonging to 25 species from six animal taxa and two plant divisions. Epibiont diversity (H') was 1.9 for Geodia cf. tumulosa and 1.94 for G. media var. leptorhaphes. Poriferans represented the most diverse group, whereas colonial ascidians were the most abundant, accounting for 45% of the epibionts´ wet weight. The percentage of similarity between the epibiotic communities of both sponge species was 57.9% (11 shared species). A significant correlation was detected between sponge size and epibiont richness. Experimentally, sponges that were deprived of epibionts showed no signs of predation but accumulated a fine sediment layer (~3 mm), suggesting that epibionts may act as a barrier against sedimentation rather than as an antipredator defense. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Enrique Ávila Torres, Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, Estación El Carmen, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Carretera Carmen-Puerto Realkm 9 . 5 , Ciudad del Carmen , Campeche, México

    Graduate of the Bachelor’s Degree in Biology with a specialization in Aquaculture from the Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa, and of the Master’s and Doctoral Programs in Marine Sciences and Limnology at the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

    He currently serves as a Full-Time Tenured Researcher (Level A) at the El Carmen Station of the Institute of Marine Sciences and Limnology at UNAM. His research lines cover various aspects of Marine Ecology, particularly the marine benthos, including population dynamics, ecological interactions, invasive species, symbiosis, reproduction, and larval ecology in marine invertebrates.

    In recent years, his work has focused on the study of the biodiversity of macroinvertebrates associated with seagrass meadows and mangrove roots along the coasts of Campeche, with special emphasis on the Porifera group.

    He has authored or co-authored numerous scientific research articles in international indexed journals and book chapters. At both undergraduate and graduate levels in different institutions, he has taught more than 20 courses and has supervised and advised several thesis students at different stages of their academic training.

     

References

Álvarez, M., Córdoba, S., Escobar, F., Fagua, G., Gast, F., Mendoza, H., & Villareal, H. (2006). Manual de métodos para el desarrollo de inventarios de biodiversidad. Bogotá, Colombia: Ramos López Editorial.

Ávila, E., & Briceño-Vera, A. E. (2018). A reciprocal inter-habitat transplant reveals changes in the assemblage structure of macroinvertebrates associated with the sponge Halichondria melanadocia. Estuaries and Coasts, 41, 1397–1409. doi: 10.1007/s12237-017-0359-2

Ávila, E., Carballo, J. L., & Cruz-Barraza, J. A. (2007). Symbiotic relationships between sponges and other organisms from the Sea of Cortes (Mexican Pacific coast): same problems, same solutions. In: Custódio, M. R., Lôbo-Hajdu, G., Hajdu, E. y Muricy, G. (Eds). Porifera Research Biodiversity, Innovation and Sustainability (pp. 147–156). Rio de Janeiro: Série Livros 28, Museau Nacional.

Bakus, J. G. (1981). Chemical defense mechanisms on the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Science, 211, 497–499. doi: 10.1126/science.7455691

Bell, J. J., McGrath, E., Biggerstaff, A., Bates, T., Bennett, H., Marlow, J., & Shaffer, M. (2015). Sediment impacts on marine sponges. Marine pollution bulletin, 94(1-2), 5-13.

Biernbaum, C. K. (1981). Seasonal changes in the amphipod fauna of Microciona prolifera (Ellis and Solander) (Porifera: Demospongiae) and associated sponges in a shallow salt-marsh creek. Estuaries, 4, 85–96. doi: 10.2307/1351671

Boury-Esnault, A., & Rützler, K. (1997). Thesaurus of sponge morphology. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, 596. doi: 10.5479/si.00810282.596

Clavico, E., Muricy, G., Da Gama, B., Batista, D., Ventura, R., & Pereira, R. (2006). Ecological roles of natural products from the marine sponge Geodia corticostylifera. Marine Biology, 148, 479–488. doi: 10.1007/s00227-005-0097-z

Cristobo, J., Victoriano, U., Solorzano, R. M., & Ríos, P. (1993). Métodos de recogida, estudio y conservación de las colecciones de Poríferos. International Symposium and First World Congress on the Preservation and Conservation of Natural History Collections, 2, 277–287.

de Laubenfels, M. W. (1950). An ecological discussion of the sponges of Bermuda. Transactions of the Zoological Society of London, 27, 155–201. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.1950.tb00228.x

de Laubenfels, M. W. (1953). Sponges from the Gulf of Mexico. Marine Science, 2, 511–557.

de León-González, J. A., Batida-Zavala, J. R., Carrera-Parra, L. F., García-Garza, M. E., Peña-Rivera, A., Salazar-Vallejo, S. I., & Solís-Weiss, V. (2009). Poliquetos (Annelida: Polychaeta) de México y América Tropical. Monterrey, México: Dirección de Publicaciones Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León.

Dunlap, M., & Pawlik, J. R. (1996). Video-monitored predation by Caribbean reef fishes on an array of mangrove and sponges. Marine Biology, 126, 117–123. doi: 10.1007/BF00571383

Hooper, J., & van Soest, R. W. M. (2002). Systema Porifera, a guide to the classification of the sponges. Kluwer Academic, Plenum Publishers. New York. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-0747-5

Klitgaard, A. B. (1995). The fauna associated with outer shelf and upper slope sponges (Porifera, Demospongiae) at the Faroe Islands, northeastern Atlantic. Sarsia, 80, 1–22. doi: 10.1080/00364827.1995.10413574

Laguarda-Figueras, A., Henández-Herrejón, L., Solís-Marín, F. A., & Durán González, A. (2009). Ofiuroideos del Caribe Mexicano y Golfo de México (1a ed.). Ciudad de México, México: Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología.

Leite, F. P., Pavani, L., & Tanaka, M. O. (2016). Temporal variation of epi-and endofaunal assemblages associated with the red sponge Tedania ignis on a rocky shore (São Sebastião Channel), SE Brazil. Iheringia, Série Zoologia, 106. doi: 10.1590/1678-4766e2016007

León-Álvarez, D., Candelaria-Silva, C. P., & León-Tejera, H. (2012). Géneros de algas marinas tropicales de México. Facultad de Ciencias UNAM: http://ficoherb.fciencias.unam.mx/publicacionesparaportal/Publicaciones/Algas_verdes.pdf

Little, F. J. (1963). The sponge fauna of the St. George Sound, Apalachee Bay, and Panamá city regions of the Florida Gulf Coast. Tulane Studies in Zoology, 11, 30–71. doi: 10.5962/bhl.part.7050

López, P. G., & Green, G. (1984). Sistemática de esponjas marinas de Puerto Morelos, Quintana Roo, México. Anales del Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, UNAM, 1, 65–90.

Mercurio, M., Corriero, G., & Gaino, E. (2006). Sessile and non-sessile morphs of Geodia cydonium (Jameson) (Porifera, Demospongiae) in two semi-enclosed Mediterranean bays. Marine Biology, 148, 489–501. doi: 10.1007/s00227-005-0092-4

Meylan, A. (1998). Spongivory in hawksbill turtles: a diet of glass. Science, 239, 393–395. doi: 10.1126/science.239.4838.393

Monniot, F. (1983). Ascidies littorales de Guadeloupe. Bulletin du Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, 4, 5–49. doi: 10.5962/p.285950

Ortiz, M., Winfield, I., & Cházaro-Olvera, S. (2012). Lista actualizada y clave ilustrada para los géneros de misidáceos (Crustacea). Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, 83, 983–1003. doi: 10.7550/rmb.27139

Pawlik, J. R., Chanas, B., Toonen, R. J., & Fenical, W. (1995). Defenses of Caribbean sponges against predatory reef fish. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 127, 183–194. doi: 10.3354/meps127183

Ramsby, B, Massaro, A., Marshall, E., Wilcox, T., & Hill, M. (2012). Epibiont-basibiont interactions: Examination of ecological factors that influence specialization in a two-sponge association between Geodia vosmaeri (Sollas, 1886) and Amphimedon erina (de Laubenfels, 1936). Hydrobiologia, 687, 331–340. doi: 10.1007/s10750-011-0878-y

Ribeiro, S. M., Cassiano, K., Cavalcanti, D., Teixeira, V., & Pereira, R. (2012). Isolated and synergistic effects of chemical and structural defenses of two species of Tethya (Porifera: Demospangiae). Journal of Sea Research, 68, 57–62. doi: 10.1016/j.seares.2011.12.002

Rützler, K. (1970). Spatial competition among porifera: solution by epizoism. Oecologia, 5, 85–95. doi: 10.1007/BF00347624

Uliczka, E. (1929). Die tetraxonen Schwämme Westindiens (auf Grund der Ergebnisse der Reise Kükenthal-Hartmeyer). In: Kükenthal, W. y Hartmeyer, R. (Eds), Ergebnisse einer zoologischen Forschungsreise nach Westindien. Zoologische Jahrbücher. Abteilung für Systematik, Geographie und Biologie der Thiere, Supplement 16, 35-62.

van Tussenbroeck, B. I., Barba-Santos, M. G., Ricardo-Wong, J. G., Kornelis van Dijk, J., & Waycott, M. (2015). A guide to the tropical seagrasses of the Western Atlantic. Caribbean Journal of Science, 46, 357–357.

Waddell, B., & Pawlik, J. R. (2000). Defenses of Caribbean sponges against invertabrate predators. II. Assays with sea stars. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 195, 133¬–144. doi: 10.3354/meps195133

Wahl, M. (1989). Marine epibiosis .1. Fouling and Antifouling - Some Basic Aspects. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 58, 175–189. doi: 10.3354/meps058175

Wahl, M. (2009). Epibiosis: marine hard bottom communities. Ecological Studies, Coral Reef, 23, 206–217. doi: 10.1007/b76710_4

Wilcox, T., Hill, M., & Demeo, K. (2002). Observations on a new two-sponges symbiosis from the Floriada Keys. Coral Reefs, 21, 198–204. doi: 10.1007/s00338-002-0221-1

World Porifera Database (2019). http://www.marinespecies.org/porifera/index.php

Wulff, J. L. (1995). Sponge-feeding by the Caribbean starfish Oreaster reticulatus. Marine Biology, 123, 313–325. doi: 10.1007/BF00353623

Wulff, J. L. (1997). Mutualisms among species of coral reef sponges. Ecology, 78, 146–159. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[0146:MASOCR]2.0.CO;2

Wulff, J. L. (2006). Ecological interactions of marine sponges. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 2, 146–166. doi: 10.1139/Z06-019

Downloads

Published

2026-03-31